Former F1 winner Jacques Villeneuve has questioned why Aussie Daniel Ricciardo is nevertheless in F1 and believes his graphic has in the end saved his occupation in a savage reside television rant.
The 34-12 months-aged is desperately clinging to hope he can complete his profession wherever it begun, with Crimson Bull, even with the doorway seemingly slamming shut when the workforce renewing Sergio Perez’s offer before in the 7 days.
Immediately after two several years with Renault and one more two with McLaren, Ricciardo hoped to rejoin the best team alongside Max Verstappen and had been putting tension on the Mexican driver in 2023.
Whilst Perez has not been excellent and is currently fifth in the driver’s championship in 2024, his 4 podium finishes in eight races ahead of the Canadian Grand Prix weekend certain Crimson Bull to lengthen his deal for one more two years.
It’s a tough blow for Ricciardo, who is six months more mature than Perez and now has to combat to continue to keep his seat with the Visa Hard cash App RB crew following a disastrous time.
Previous F1 champion Jacques Villeneuve has questioned why Daniel Ricciardo is still in F1
Ricciardo is at this time driving for Visa Money App RB and fighting to prolong his job
Now 1997 F1 environment winner Jacques Villeneuve has absent nuclear on the Aussie driver, telling him to give up and ‘go home’.
‘Why’s he continue to in F1? Why?’ Villeneuve fumed on Sky Sporting activities F1.
‘We are listening to the very same factor now for the last four or five decades. ‘We have to make the vehicle superior for him’. Sorry, it really is been five decades of that. No, you are in F1.
‘Maybe you make that effort and hard work for Lewis Hamilton whose received numerous championships. You don’t make that effort for a driver who are not able to minimize it.
‘If you cannot cut it, go home, you will find anyone else to consider your place. That’s how it is often been in racing, it can be the pinnacle of the activity.
‘There’s no purpose to maintain heading and to keep getting excuses, and you all talk about that initial year or very first two seasons, he was beating a Vettel that was burnt out, that was trying to invent issues with the vehicle to go earn and just earning a mess of his weekends.
‘Then he was beating for fifty percent a period Verstappen when Verstappen was 18 years previous, just commencing, that was it, he stopped beating any one immediately after that.’
The doorway seemingly shut for a fairytale return to Crimson Bull this week when the team re-signed Sergio Perez instead
Ricciardo appreciated lots of good results in the course of his 1st stint with Purple Bull, including profitable the Monaco GP in 2018
Ricciardo also loved one particular of his most well-known victories in Italy when he was driving for McLaren
Questioned if he thinks Ricciardo’s occupation is overrated, Villeneuve mentioned: ‘I consider his picture has saved him in F1 far more than his genuine final results.’
F1 followers have been left stunned by the harsh assessment of Ricciardo’s profession, even if he is closer to the stop than the beginning.
‘It doesn’t shock me and it won’t modify anything at all for me,’ Ricciardo informed Sky F1 about Perez’ new deal.
‘Obviously, my purpose, at some position, I might really like to be again there [at Red Bull]. But I also know that my season hasn’t been stunning. I had a breathtaking minute I consider in Miami, but normally, I have been a little bit up and down.
‘And search, I have been executing this very long enough, I know myself that I want to be performing superior.
‘I believe by now after the very first handful of races, I was just really focused on attempting to do the most I can listed here. And by means of that, then I’ll have maybe the most command around my long term.
‘So up till now, yeah, I haven’t most likely been great sufficient, but similarly, I am delighted staying listed here and just getting back in the Crimson Bull relatives.
‘So we will preserve charging forward and yeah, I never imagine now it signifies it will hardly ever occur. But we will see.’